LaptopMag have launched a small Benchmarking between two processors, Intel Pentium SU4100 and AMD Turion X2 Neo L625, having as basis of his tests, the Toshiba Satellite T135 and T135D.
The ultraportable 13.3-inch Toshiba Satellite T135 (SU4100, 4GB, GMA X4500) and T135D Toshiba Satellite (L625, 4GB, ATI Mobility Radeon HD3200) were the test platform for this test. This is the same model that integrates the Intel platform (T135) and AMD (T135D), the latter for sale at a price lower than the $ 100 Intel-based version. The two notebooks are quite thin, but after having integrated the 6-cell battery, the thickness increases slightly.

Typing on the keyboard is a bit ‘limited since it does not occupy the entire length of the base. The selection of the touchpad buttons are thin and durable. The screen offers a good view bright, with fairly wide viewing angles, but the treatment causes the unpleasant reflections in bright environments too bright. Toshiba Satellite T135D gets a score of 2557 points in PCMark Vantage, which is 180 points more than the average. The score of the Satellite T135 is 2701 points. These two ultra behave very well in everyday applications such as Internet browsing, writing documents, playing video and audio.
As for video encoding, Satellite T135 shows faster than Satellite T135D. In return, we obtain the inverse performance multithreading where Toshiba Satellite T135D is two times faster than the Toshiba Satellite T135. Startup time is less than 20 seconds on T135D, while on the storage data transfer speed is somewhat ‘faster on T135. The WiFi module seems to be more efficient on T135D. Regarding the graphics component, Satellite T135D is able to accomplish more with its ATI Mobility Radeon HD3200 totaling a score of 1048 in 3DMark06, which is 200 points higher on average and 330 points more than Satellite T135 (718 points).

Reading the video trailer of Avatar to 1080p on a screen 32-inch Samsung attravero the HDMI output is fluid on both notebooks. T135D On satellite, World of Warcraft is played with an average of 30fps, details of defaults to 1024 × 768 (6 fps with ultra-effects), against respectively 23 fps and 4 fps on the Satellite T135. In contrast, T135 dominated by autonomy with 7:23 hours of continuous operation hours to 5:06 against T135D. In conclusion, Toshiba Satellite Toshiba Satellite T135 and T135 both have strengths and weaknesses. The first (+100 dollars) offers enhanced autonomy, while the second least expensive higher returns and faster graphics performance in multithreaded applications.


